UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 28103/2024

·EP2671173: METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Other Procedural
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Nadine Westermeyer (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Respondents
Reps: Mikko Kalervo Väänänen
Division
Paris CD
Judges
Technology
Computing & AI
Language
First decided
Jul 2, 2024
Decisions
  • 2024-07-02
    Generic application

    Paris Central Division (judge-rapporteur Catallozzi) order dismissing Microsoft Corporation's application to declare Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies' infringement action inadmissible on the ground that Suinno's representative was not independent under Art. 48 UPCA and the code of conduct. The Court held that a violation of the independence obligation cannot be invoked by the opposing party (only by the represented party itself), and that the representative being the inventor and original applicant does not in itself render them non-independent for purposes of R. 290-292 RoP.

    Legal issues:Representative independence (Art. 48 UPCA, code of conduct)Admissibility of infringement action (R. 361 RoP)Standing to challenge representative's independence
Documents
  • A8DCDF78D3EF8E638590FD733090C92D_en.pdf2024-07-02ENGLISH