- Case details
- StatusWithdrawnActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Tiroler Rohre GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Florian Robl-Torggler & Hofmann Patentanwälte
Respondents- SSAB Swedish Steel GmbHOperating co.
- SSAB Europe OyOperating co.
Representatives- Christian Meyer-Maiwald
- Division
- Munich LD
- Technology
- Other fieldsCivil engineering
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Oct 24, 2024
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Munich LD | Locked |
| Judge Matthias Zigann | Locked |
| Judge Margot Kokke | Locked |
| Judge Dennis Kretschmann | Locked |
| Judge Tobias Pichlmaier | Locked |
At the UPC: Tiroler Rohre GmbH (7 cases)·SSAB Swedish Steel GmbH (7 cases)
This dispute contains 6 other proceedings
UPC CFI 598/2025·UPC CoA 153/2025·UPC CFI 640/2024·UPC CFI 487/2024·UPC CFI 324/2024 and 1 more
- 2024-10-24
Summary: Munich Local Division decision following the applicant Tiroler Rohre GmbH's withdrawal of an application for provisional measures (R. 265 RoP) after the oral hearing and after the court had indicated concerns about granting the measures. The court dismissed the respondents' (SSAB) opposition to the withdrawal, holding that a legitimate interest in obtaining a substantive decision does not arise merely because the respondents incurred costs defending against the application, even where the applicant has announced forthcoming main proceedings on the same subject matter. The court also declined to order a preliminary costs decision in favour of respondents following withdrawal.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Withdrawal of provisional measures application (R. 265 RoP)
- Legitimate interest in decision after withdrawal
- Costs following withdrawal
- Oral hearing in provisional measures proceedings
- D5E7AE48ACCAF665DB1722568654D87D_de.pdf2024-10-24DE