UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 61657/2024

·EP2671173: METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Other Procedural
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Petri Eskola (Backström & Co)
Respondents
Reps: Tilman Müller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg); Nadine Westermeyer (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Division
Paris CD
Judges
Technology
Computing & AI
Language
First decided
Apr 2, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-04-02
    Generic application

    Order of the Paris Central Division (full panel) declining to issue a decision by default against Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy (claimant in infringement action) following Suinno's failure to provide security for costs within the Court-set deadline. Microsoft Corporation (defendant/counterclaimant) requested a default decision revoking the patent and dismissing the infringement action. The court set out key headnotes: (1) even where the default is evident and unjustified, the court retains discretionary power not to issue a default decision; (2) the court may decline a default where the evidentiary record at time of default does not allow sufficiently confident assessment of the non-defaulting party's claims. The court found the existing record insufficient to confidently assess the merits of Microsoft's revocation counterclaim and declined to revoke the patent by default.

    Legal issues:Decision by default under Rule 355 RoPCourt's discretion not to issue default decision even where default is establishedSufficiency of evidence record as condition for default revocationFailure to pay security for costs as default trigger
Documents
  • B3A24CE1DC2566B55752D74DED7DFD0A_en.pdf2025-04-02ENGLISH