View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Respondents
- Guangzhou Aiyun Yanwu Technology Co., Ltd.Operating co.
- Division
- Munich LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Mechanical engineeringHandling
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Dec 9, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Munich LD | Locked |
| Judge Tobias Pichlmaier | Locked |
At the UPC: air up group GmbH (6 cases)·Guangzhou Aiyun Yanwu Technology Co., Ltd. (5 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 3 other proceedings
1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
Decisions
- 2024-12-09
Summary: The Local Division Munich held that R.275.1 RoP requires an attempt at alternative service even when formal service under the Hague Convention has been seriously and definitively refused, but that alternative service can be dispensed with only if legally and factually impossible; since no alternative was available, the court was unable to order good service under R.275.2 without first exhausting other options.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Service abroad (R.274-275 RoP)
- Hague Service Convention refusal
- Alternative service requirement
- Good service under R.275.2 RoP
Documents
- 48776B43173CFDDA143A39BAEEA3E1A3_en.pdf2024-12-09EN