UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 64021/2024

EP3655341 Unitary patent · DRINKING DEVICE

Case details
Status
—
Action
Procedural application
Category
Other procedural
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Division
Munich LD
Technology
  • Mechanical engineering
    Handling
Language
—
First decided
Jan 21, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Munich LDLocked
Judge Matthias ZigannLocked
Judge Pierluigi PerrottiLocked
Judge Tobias PichlmaierLocked

At the UPC: air up group GmbH (6 cases)·Guangzhou Aiyun Yanwu Technology Co., Ltd. (5 cases)

This dispute contains 3 other proceedings

UPC CFI 508/2023·UPC APP 64018/2024·UPC APP 64978/2024

1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CFI 497/2023

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Munich LD·2024

Decisions
  • 2025-01-21

    Summary: The Local Division Munich held that where formal service of the provisional measures application under R.274 RoP was impossible, a subsequent decision by default need not be re-attempted under R.274 before proceeding to an order under R.275.2 RoP, in order to preserve the right to effective judicial protection.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Service of default decision (R.275.2 RoP)
    • Effective judicial protection
    • Hague Service Convention – Chinese authority refusal
    • R.274 vs R.275.2 sequence
Documents
  • 4C5B6D602782F2B27E96F39C9AC27430_en.pdf2025-01-21EN