View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- ClaimantsRepresentatives
- Mikko Kalervo Väänänen-Suinno Oy
Respondents- Microsoft CorporationOperating co.
Representatives- Tilman Müller-Stoy-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Nadine Westermeyer-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Division
- Paris CD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringTelecommunications · Digital communication · Computer technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Mar 13, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Paris CD | Locked |
| Judge Paolo Catallozzi | Locked |
| Judge Tatyana Zhilova | Locked |
| Judge Wiem Samoud | Locked |
At the UPC: Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy (29 cases)·Microsoft Group (34 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 26 other proceedings
UPC CoA 51/2026·UPC CoA 21/2026·UPC CFI 544/2026·UPC CoA 911/2025·UPC CoA 883/2025 and 21 more
Decisions
- 2025-03-13
Summary: The Paris Central Division (Panel 2) rejected Microsoft Corporation's application to have Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy's infringement action declared manifestly inadmissible on the grounds that the claimant's representative allegedly had excessive financial authority over the claimant entity, finding that a lack of valid representation does not render the action inadmissible but merely requires the party to remedy the deficit.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Manifest inadmissibility of action
- Valid representation of party under UPC rules
- Distinction between invalid representation and inadmissibility
Documents
- 0EFE02853DCCFBAD16239A6F2660838B_en.pdf2025-03-13EN