UPClytics
ENDE
Sign inStart trial
View all cases

UPC CFI 425/2025

May 14, 2025·EP2643717 · COLOR-MIXING CONVERGENT OPTICAL SYSTEM

Follow
Case details
Status
Case Closed (Patent upheld as granted)
Action
Revocation
Category
Main revocation action
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Division
Paris CD
Judges
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Audio-visual technology
  • Instruments
    Optics
Language
German
First decided
Jun 25, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Patent revokedMedian days to first decision
All UPC37% (34/91)124
Paris CDLockedLocked
Judge Maximilian HaedickeLockedLocked
Judge Tatyana ZhilovaLockedLocked
Judge Uwe SchwengelbeckLockedLocked

At the UPC: Chainzone Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. (3 cases)·SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme GmbH (11 cases)

Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patent

This dispute contains 3 other proceedings

UPC APP 24558/2025·UPC APP 25380/2024·PC-CoA-001/2025

5 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CFI 618/2025·UPC CFI 245/2025·UPC CoA 70/2025·UPC CoA 76/2025·UPC CFI 33/2024

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Paris CD·2025

Decisions
  • 2026-06-25
    Revocation ActionPublic

    Summary: The Central Division Paris dismissed the revocation action against EP 2 643 717, a color-mixing light-collecting optics patent. The court assessed validity in the form restricted by the EPO under Art. 105a EPC during the proceedings and upheld the patent, establishing that Art. 105a(2) EPC has no effect on UPC revocation jurisdiction. The claimant and its intervener (Chainzone Technology) were ordered to bear the costs.

    Show the legal issues (6)
    • revocation on grounds of added matter
    • revocation on grounds of insufficient disclosure
    • revocation on grounds of lack of novelty
    • revocation on grounds of lack of inventive step
    • effect of EPO limitation procedure under Art. 105a EPC on pending UPC revocation proceedings
    • inapplicability of Art. 105a(2) EPC to UPC revocation jurisdiction
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Other Documents2026-07-29Not public
Receipt2026-07-24Not public
Cover sheet2026-07-24Not public
Application Respondent2026-07-24Not public
Receipt2026-07-17Not public
Cover sheet2026-07-17Not public
Application document Claimant2026-07-17Not public
Case closed2026-06-25Not public
Decision2026-06-25Not public
Decision2026-06-25Public
Hearing recording reference document2026-05-13Not public
Oral procedure closed2026-05-13Not public
Interim procedure closed2026-05-11Not public
Other Documents2026-05-04Not public
Receipt2026-04-30Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-30Not public
Document Claimant2026-04-30Not public
Receipt2026-04-30Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-30Not public
Document Claimant2026-04-30Not public
Written procedure closed2026-04-30Not public
Receipt2026-04-30Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-30Not public
Application document Defendant2026-04-30Not public
Receipt2026-04-28Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-28Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-04-28Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-04-28Not public
Submission Defendant2026-04-28Not public
Receipt2026-04-07Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-07Not public
Receipt2026-04-07Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-07Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-04-07Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-04-07Not public
Submission Claimant2026-04-07Not public
Exhibit Intervener2026-04-07Not public
Exhibit Intervener2026-04-07Not public
Submission Intervener2026-04-07Not public
Order2026-03-26Not public
Order2026-03-26Not public
Hearing recording reference document2026-03-19Not public
Communication2026-03-19Not public
Receipt2026-03-12Not public
Cover sheet2026-03-12Not public
Document2026-03-12Not public
Cover sheet2025-11-28Not public
Further pleadings2025-11-28Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-11-28Not public
Receipt2025-11-28Not public
Cover sheet2025-11-28Not public
Further pleadings2025-11-28Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-11-28Not public
Receipt2025-11-28Not public
Summons to interim conference2025-11-26Not public
Order2025-11-26Not public
Cover sheet2025-11-24Not public
Other document Defendant2025-11-24Not public
Receipt2025-11-24Not public
Communication2025-11-17Not public
Cover sheet2025-11-14Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2025-11-14Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2025-11-14Not public
Other document Defendant2025-11-14Not public
Receipt2025-11-14Not public
Order2025-10-30Not public
Order2025-10-30Not public
Order2025-10-30Not public
Order2025-10-30Not public
Communication2025-10-30Not public
Cover sheet2025-10-29Not public
Application2025-10-29Not public
Exhibit2025-10-29Not public
Exhibit2025-10-29Not public
Receipt2025-10-29Not public
Cover sheet2025-10-29Not public
Further pleadings2025-10-29Not public
Receipt2025-10-29Not public
Cover sheet2025-10-29Not public
Statement of rejoinder2025-10-29Not public
Receipt2025-10-29Not public
Order2025-10-14Not public
Order2025-10-14Not public
Cover sheet2025-10-07Not public
Further pleadings2025-10-07Not public
Receipt2025-10-07Not public
Cover sheet2025-10-07Not public
Other document2025-10-07Not public
Receipt2025-10-07Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-09-16Not public
Verfahrensordnung2025-09-16Public
Receipt2025-09-15Not public
Antrag auf Zustellung des Streithilfeschriftsatzes, Klarstellungsersuchen2025-09-15Not public
Screenshot CMS, Workflow ACT_22511/20252025-09-15Not public
Screenshot CMS, Workflow App_24558/20252025-09-15Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-08-01Not public
Verfahrensordnung2025-08-01Public
Receipt2025-07-31Not public
Anfrage betreffend Eingangsdatum2025-07-31Not public
Anlage BB 12025-07-31Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-07-29Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2025-07-29Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-07-28Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2025-07-28Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-07-28Not public
Berichtigung CMS2025-07-28Not public
Verfahrensanordnung2025-07-27Public
Preliminary_Objection_DecisionOutcome2025-07-27Not public
Verfahrensanordnung2025-07-27Public
Formal-checks_Failure-to-comply-with-a-request-for-correction2025-07-24Not public
Stellungnahme2025-07-24Not public
Beilage SWR-KE102025-07-23Not public
Beilage SWR-KE92025-07-23Not public
Klageerwiderung2025-07-23Not public
Beilage SWR-KE62025-07-23Not public
Beilage SWR-KE42025-07-23Not public
Beilage SWR-KE22025-07-23Not public
Beilage SWR-KE32025-07-23Not public
Beilage SWR-KE112025-07-23Not public
Beilage SWR-KE52025-07-23Not public
Klageerwiderung (berichtigte Fassung)2025-07-23Not public
Beilagenverzeichnis2025-07-23Not public
Maengelbehebung2025-07-23Not public
Beilage SWR-KE12025-07-23Not public
Beilage SWR-KE72025-07-23Not public
Beilage SWR-KE82025-07-23Not public
Formal-checks_Request-for-correction2025-07-21Not public
250721 Bedingter Aenderungsantrag2025-07-21Not public
Beilage SWR-KE112025-07-21Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-07-21Not public
Beilage SWR-KE72025-07-21Not public
Beilage SWR-KE82025-07-21Not public
Beilagenverzeichnis2025-07-21Not public
Beilage SWR-KE92025-07-21Not public
Beilage SWR-KE42025-07-21Not public
Beilage SWR-KE112025-07-21Not public
Beilage SWR-KE102025-07-21Not public
Beilage SWR-KE52025-07-21Not public
Beilage SWR-KE12025-07-21Not public
Beilage SWR-KE22025-07-21Not public
Beilage SWR-KE62025-07-21Not public
Beilage SWR-KE32025-07-21Not public
Klageerwiderung2025-07-21Not public
procedural order2025-07-18Not public
Comment-On-Preliminary-Objection2025-06-26Not public
Comments on preliminary objection2025-06-26Not public
Exhibit bundle BB A42025-06-26Not public
Exhibit BB A52025-06-26Not public
Preliminary-Objection2025-06-12Not public
SWR4 - Mitglieder Hague Convention 20192025-06-12Not public
SWR2 - Berufungsbegruendung Chainzone2025-06-12Not public
SWR5 - Entscheidung OGH 3 Nc 15-14g2025-06-12Not public
Einspruch2025-06-12Not public
SWR3 - Mitglieder Hague Convention 19542025-06-12Not public
SWR6 - Merkblatt dt. Vertretung in CN2025-06-12Not public
SWR1 - Schreiben von PA Henhapel2025-06-12Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-05-30Not public
Document from EPO2025-05-23Not public
Notification Of Service2025-05-22Not public
Acknowledgement of access to case2025-05-22Not public
Acknowledgement of access to case2025-05-21Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-05-19Not public
Letter-for-Service2025-05-19Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-05-19Not public
EPO-Request-for-case-pending2025-05-19Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-05-19Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2025-05-19Not public
D10_EP_0860805_A12025-05-14Not public
D1_US_2009/0073710_A12025-05-14Not public
D12_WO_0217628_A22025-05-14Not public
250514 Nichtigkeitsklage EP 2643717 gegen SWARCO2025-05-14Not public
BB-1_Zahlungsbeleg2025-05-14Not public
D5_Beam-shaping lenses in illumination optics(Tukker)2025-05-14Not public
BB_A3_WO_201206863_A12025-05-14Not public
D8_DE_20019735_U12025-05-14Not public
D9_AT_505572_A12025-05-14Not public
D11_EP_1227458_A22025-05-14Not public
D3_US_2006061870_A12025-05-14Not public
D2_US_7607804_B22025-05-14Not public
D4_Freeform surface design for a light-emitting diode–based collimating lens (Chen)2025-05-14Not public
D7_DE_10005653_A12025-05-14Not public
D6_DE10142582B42025-05-14Not public
BB_A1_EP_2643717_B1(Klagepatent)2025-05-14Not public
BB_A2_Merkmalsgliederung2025-05-14Not public
Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.

  • The patent is valid in its form as restricted by the EPO under Art. 105a EPC; none of the raised revocation grounds are established against the restricted claims

    RespondentLegal basis: Art. 65 UPCA; Art. 138 EPC

  • When the EPO restricts a patent under Art. 105a EPC during pending UPC revocation proceedings, the court must assess validity of the patent in its restricted form

    RespondentLegal basis: Art. 105a EPC; Art. 65 UPCA

  • Art. 105a(2) EPC has no effect on UPC revocation proceedings and does not preclude UPC jurisdiction

    RespondentLegal basis: Art. 105a(2) EPC; Art. 32 UPCA
Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.

  • The patent should be revoked in full on grounds of added matter, insufficient disclosure, lack of novelty, and/or lack of inventive step

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 65 UPCA; Art. 138 EPC