UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 450/2024

Jul 30, 2024·EP1875683 · INTEGRATED CIRCUIT WITH DATA COMMUNICATION NETWORK AND IC DESIGN METHOD

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Patent upheld as granted)
Action
Counterclaim for revocation
Category
Counterclaim for revocation
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Munich LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Digital communication
Language
English
First decided
Mar 11, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Patent revokedMedian days to first decision
All UPC37% (34/91)124
Munich LDLockedLocked
Judge Daniel VossLockedLocked
Judge Pierluigi PerrottiLockedLocked
Judge Georg WernerLockedLocked
Judge Andrea ScillettaLockedLocked

At the UPC: Qualcomm Group (28 cases)·Network System Technologies LLC (77 cases)

This dispute contains 10 other proceedings

UPC CoA 68/2026·UPC CoA 69/2026·UPC CoA 70/2026·UPC CoA 71/2026·UPC CoA 72/2026 and 5 more

9 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CoA 217/2024·UPC CoA 218/2024·UPC CoA 224/2024·CC 24453/2024·UPC CFI 167/2024 and 4 more

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Munich LD·2024

Decisions
  • 2026-03-11
    revocation counterclaim

    Summary: 1. The Infringement action is dismissed. 2. The Counterclaim for revocation is dismissed.

Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Order2026-04-14Not public
Order2026-04-14Public
Receipt2026-04-13Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-13Not public
Application document Applicant2026-04-13Not public
Hearing recording reference document2026-04-01Not public
Decision2026-03-16Public
Case closed2026-03-11Not public
Decision2026-03-11Not public
Decision2026-03-11Not public
Decision2026-03-11Not public
Order2026-03-10Not public
Order2026-03-10Public
Order2026-02-10Not public
Order2026-02-10Public
Oral procedure closed2026-02-10Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-17Not public
Application document Claimant2025-12-17Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-17Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-17Not public
Receipt2025-12-17Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-15Not public
Other document Defendant2025-12-15Not public
Receipt2025-12-15Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-15Not public
Further pleadings2025-12-15Not public
Receipt2025-12-15Not public
Order2025-12-10Not public
Order2025-12-10Public
Interim procedure opened2025-12-10Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-02Not public
Further pleadings2025-12-02Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-02Not public
Receipt2025-12-02Not public
Communication2025-12-01Not public
Order2025-10-20Not public
Order2025-10-20Public
Order2025-10-15Not public
Order2025-10-15Public
Other Documents2025-10-15Not public
Communication2025-10-15Not public
Summons to oral hearing2025-10-15Not public
Summons2025-10-15Public
Order2025-10-15Not public
Order2025-10-15Public
Outcome of the Order2025-09-03Not public
2025-09-03 - Order R.158 RoP2025-09-03Public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-08-28Not public
2025-08-21 Order - invitation to comment re R.158.12025-08-21Not public
Receipt2025-08-21Not public
Counterclaim - Security for costs - Request of Qualcomm2025-08-20Not public
Comments re. hearing dates - Qualcomm2025-07-22Not public
Exhibit P CR 22025-07-18Not public
Exhibit P CR 32025-07-18Not public
Exhibit P CR 12025-07-18Not public
Exhibit P CR 42025-07-18Not public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-07-18Not public
2025-07-15 - Order - inv to comment on pre dates et al2025-07-15Not public
Hearing-Dates2025-07-15Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-05-26Not public
2025-05-26 Order re deadline extension2025-05-26Public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-05-22Not public
Pleading2025-05-22Not public
Exhibit P CR 3a2025-05-22Not public
Exhibit P CR 32025-05-22Not public
Receipt2025-05-15Not public
Request for extension of deadline2025-05-14Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-04-22Not public
Reply to the Defence2025-04-22Not public
Formal response to the Order of the Court2025-03-27Not public
Response of Qualcomm2025-03-27Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-03-24Not public
2025-03-24 Order - deadline extension and invitation to comment2025-03-24Public
Receipt2025-03-19Not public
Time extension - Request of Qualcomm2025-03-18Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2025-02-05Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-02-05Not public
Pleading2025-02-04Not public
Exhibit P CR 1/Carloni2025-02-04Not public
Exhibit P CR2/IPR2025-02-04Not public
Outcome of the Order2024-11-29Not public
2024-11-29 - Order - Extension of time limits2024-11-29Public
Receipt2024-11-14Not public
Exhibit ED 62024-11-13Not public
Exhibit ED 52024-11-13Not public
Application2024-11-13Not public
Outcome of the Order2024-10-01Not public
2024-10-01 - Order - Deadline extension re Reply to SoD and Defence to CC2024-10-01Public
Receipt2024-09-30Not public
Exhibit ED 42024-09-27Not public
Exhibit ED 32024-09-27Not public
Application2024-09-27Not public
Exhibit ED 42024-09-27Not public
Exhibit ED 22024-09-27Not public
Exhibit ED 12024-09-27Not public
Exhibit ED 32024-09-27Not public
Exhibit ED 12024-09-27Not public
Exhibit ED 22024-09-27Not public
Notification Of Service2024-09-09Not public
Access to case2024-09-09Not public
Zustellnachweise2024-09-09Not public
Acknowledgement of access to case2024-08-05Not public
epoUploadDocumentsWorkflow2024-08-05Not public
Document from EPO2024-08-05Not public
Letter for Service2024-08-01Not public
Panel-Appointment2024-08-01Not public
EPO-Request-for-case-pending2024-08-01Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-08-01Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2024-08-01Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 1 - Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 2 - Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 4 - Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Exhibit BP-CR00 - Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 3 - Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Counterclaim for Revocation2024-07-30Not public
Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.
  • Claims 1 and 8 as amended during examination do not constitute an inadmissible intermediate generalisation; on a correct construction the complete data package must implicitly be transmitted within N clock cycles

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 138(1)(c) EPC, Art. 123(2) EPC, Art. 65(2) UPCA
  • Claims 1 and 8 are novel over Bertozzi and inventive over Bertozzi combined with Nowatzyk (US 6,081,844)

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 54 EPC, Art. 56 EPC
  • Width converters and rate adapters in the accused Qualcomm NoC ICs are not M*N data storage elements that delay a whole data package by M*N clock cycles, so feature group 4 is not realised, literally or by equivalence

    RespondentLegal basis: claim construction of claim 1 feature group 4 and claim 8; doctrine of equivalence
Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.
  • The amendment of claims 1 and 8 during examination was an inadmissible intermediate generalisation of what was described in the application as filed

    RespondentLegal basis: Art. 138(1)(c) EPC, Art. 123(2) EPC
  • Claims 1 and 8 lack novelty over Bertozzi and lack an inventive step over Bertozzi combined with Nowatzyk

    RespondentLegal basis: Art. 54 EPC, Art. 56 EPC
  • The accused Qualcomm NoC ICs, built on Arteris-derived technology, infringe claims 1 and 8 literally or, in the alternative, by equivalence

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 25 UPCA; claim 1 and claim 8 features