View all cases
UPC CFI 675/2025
Jul 28, 2025·EP3392438 · FURNITURE HINGE
- Case details
- StatusOral PhaseActionInfringementCategoryMain infringement action
- Parties
- Claimants
- Julius Blum GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Markus Gangl-Torggler & Hofmann Patentanwälte
- Florian Robl-Torggler & Hofmann Patentanwälte
- Martin Schwingshackl-Torggler & Hofmann Patentanwälte
- Almar Lerchersupporting-Torggler & Hofmann Patentanwälte
Respondents- ARTURO SALICE S.p.A.Operating co.
Representatives- Marco Francesco Antonio Francetti-Jacobacci Avvocati
- Elena Prandoni-Jacobacci Avvocati
- Constantin Kurtz-CMS Hasche Sigle Partnerschaft von Rechtsanwälten und Steuerberatern mbB
- Steffen Falk Leihkaufsupporting-Jacobacci Avvocati
- Matteo Mozzisupporting-Jacobacci Avvocati
- Dr.-Ing. Volker Jordansupporting-Weickmann & Weickmann Patent- und Rechtsanwälte PartmbB
- Maximilian Rienhardtsupporting-Weickmann & Weickmann Patent- und Rechtsanwälte PartmbB
- Division
- Munich LD
- Technology
- Other fieldsCivil engineering
- Language
- German
- First decided
- Aug 3, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
| Infringement found | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| Munich LD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Matthias Zigann | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Mojca Mlakar | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Tobias Pichlmaier | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Christoph Schober | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: Julius Blum GmbH (5 cases)·ARTURO SALICE S.p.A. (2 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 1 other proceedings
Decisions
- 2026-08-03InfringementPublic
Summary: Order of the Munich Local Division following the interim conference of 31 July 2026 under R. 105.5 RoP. The oral hearing of 1 October 2026 was confirmed, further written submissions were permitted with a ten-page limit (claimant by 14 August, defendant by 28 August 2026), all submissions filed so far were admitted, presentations must be filed by 24 September 2026, and the value in dispute was set at EUR 3.3m for the action and EUR 4.95m for the counterclaim, EUR 8.25m in total. The rapporteur noted the restrictive case law on simultaneous interpretation, which the defendant may arrange at its own expense.
Show the legal issues (4)
- orders after the interim conference (R. 105.5 RoP)
- value in dispute for action and counterclaim
- admission of party submissions
- simultaneous interpretation at the oral hearing (R. 109 RoP)
Documents
Show all 236 documents| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Hearing recording reference document | 2026-10-05 | Not public |
| Communication | 2026-10-05 | Not public |
| Other Documents | 2026-10-05 | Not public |
| Communication | 2026-10-05 | Not public |
| Other Documents | 2026-10-01 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2026-09-24 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-09-24 | Not public |
| Document Defendant | 2026-09-24 | Not public |
| Submission Defendant | 2026-09-24 | Not public |
| Communication | 2026-09-18 | Not public |