UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 791/2024

Dec 9, 2024·EP3611989 SEP +1 more · METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK INFORMATION

Action number: ACT 65376/2024

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Provisional measures
Category
Provisional measures
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Patents
Division
Munich LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Digital communication
Language
German
First decided
Dec 11, 2024
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Preliminary injunction grantedMedian days to first decision
All UPC54% (38/70)124
Munich LDLockedLocked
Judge Matthias ZigannLockedLocked
Judge Edger BrinkmanLockedLocked
Judge Tobias PichlmaierLockedLocked

At the UPC: Huawei Group (62 cases)·Netgear Group (20 cases)

Related cases

This dispute contains 16 other proceedings

CC 20512/2024·UPC CFI 152/2024·UPC CoA 36/2024·UPC CoA 44/2024·UPC CFI 168/2024 and 11 more

9 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CoA 180/2026·UPC CFI 1271/2026·UPC CFI 3450/2026·UPC CFI 3451/2026·UPC CFI 3452/2026 and 4 more

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Munich LD·2024

Decisions
  • 2024-12-11
    Application for provisional measuresPublic

    Summary: The Munich Local Division granted Huawei an anti-suit/anti-enforcement injunction ordering Netgear to withdraw its anti-enforcement injunction application before a US court (C.D. Cal.) that sought to prevent Huawei from enforcing its SEP patents (EP 3 611 989 and EP 3 678 321) before the UPC, holding that such foreign proceedings violate the EU Charter right to access to justice.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • anti-suit injunction / anti-enforcement injunction Art. 32(1)(a)(c) UPCA
    • standard-essential patents FRAND
    • Art. 47 EU Charter access to justice
    • UPC jurisdiction for AASI
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2025-01-14Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-01-13Not public
R 265 final2025-01-13Public
Receipt2025-01-13Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-01-13Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-01-13Not public
R 265 final2025-01-13Public
25-01-10_-_UPC_CFI_791_2024_-_Freigabe_Sicherheitsleistung_-_Huawei_vs_Netgear2025-01-10Not public
25-01-10_-_UPC_CFI_791_2024_-_Freigabe_Sicherheitsleistung_-_Huawei_vs_Netgear2025-01-10Not public
25-01-10_-_UPC_CFI_791_2024_-_Freigabe_Sicherheitsleistung_-_Huawei_vs_Netgear2025-01-10Not public
25-01-10_-_UPC_CFI_791_2024_-_Zustimmung_Antragsruecknahme_-_Huawei_vs_Netgear2025-01-10Not public
R 265 comments2025-01-10Not public
Acknowledgement of access to case2025-01-10Not public
Acknowledgement of access to case2025-01-09Not public
Acknowledgement of access to case2025-01-09Not public
Receipt2025-01-09Not public
Rücknahme Antrag auf Anordnung einstweiliger Maßnahmen (AASI)2025-01-08Not public
Rücknahme Antrag auf Anordnung einstweiliger Maßnahmen (AASI)2025-01-08Not public
ASt 072024-12-27Not public
Nachweis Sicherheitsleistung2024-12-27Not public
Receipt2024-12-23Not public
Zustellungsnachweise AG1 und AG32024-12-20Not public
ASt 062024-12-20Not public
Zustellungsnachweise AG1 und AG32024-12-20Not public
Outcome of the Order2024-12-20Not public
vollstreckbare Ausfertigungen2024-12-20Public
Outcome of the Order2024-12-19Not public
Auslandszustellung2024-12-19Public
Receipt2024-12-19Not public
Antrag Auslandszustellung Irland2024-12-18Not public
Antrag Auslandszustellung USA2024-12-18Not public
Receipt2024-12-17Not public
Antrag auf vollstreckbare Ausfertigung2024-12-11Not public
Notice of Provisional measures and instructions for access to proceedings2024-12-11Not public
Notice of Provisional measures and instructions for access to proceedings2024-12-11Not public
Notice of Provisional measures and instructions for access to proceedings2024-12-11Not public
Measures_DecisionOutcome_Notification.pdf2024-12-11Not public
AASI AAEI2024-12-11Not public
AASI AAEI2024-12-11Public
Panel-Appointment2024-12-11Not public
Panel-Appointment2024-12-11Not public
Application-For-Measures-Receipt2024-12-11Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2024-12-11Not public
Application-For-Measures-Acknowledgement2024-12-11Not public
Antrag auf einstweilige Maßnahmen (AASI)2024-12-11Not public
Antrag auf einstweilige Maßnahmen (AASI)2024-12-11Not public
ASt 052024-12-11Not public
Hinweis einheitliches Verfahren2024-12-11Not public
ASt 022024-12-11Not public
ASt 002024-12-11Not public
Hinweis auf technische Probleme2024-12-11Not public
Hinweis einheitliches Verfahren2024-12-11Not public
Antrag auf einstweilige Maßnahmen (AASI)2024-12-11Not public
Antrag auf einstweilige Maßnahmen (AASI)2024-12-11Not public
ASt 022024-12-11Not public
ASt 042024-12-11Not public
ASt 052024-12-11Not public
ASt 012024-12-11Not public
ASt 042024-12-11Not public
ASt 032024-12-11Not public
Hinweis auf technische Probleme2024-12-11Not public
Coverage: Partial.Reasoning extracted with partial coverage — some sections may be incomplete.
Plain-English summary

Huawei applied for an anti-anti-suit / anti-enforcement injunction against Netgear, which had filed a US proceeding (C.D. Cal.) seeking to prevent Huawei from enforcing its SEP patents (EP 3 611 989 and EP 3 678 321) at the UPC. The Munich Local Division granted the measure, holding that the UPC has jurisdiction to issue such orders, and that foreign anti-enforcement injunctions violate the EU Charter right of access to justice (Art. 47) and constitute a tortious act under German law. Netgear was ordered to immediately withdraw its US application on pain of daily fines up to EUR 250,000.

Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.
  • UPC has jurisdiction under Art. 32(1)(a) and (c) UPCA to issue anti-anti-suit / anti-enforcement injunctions against foreign proceedings threatening UPC access

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 32(1)(a)(c) UPCA

    Note: The Munich Local Division established UPC subject-matter jurisdiction for AASI/AEI measures against Netgear's US court proceedings.

  • Foreign anti-suit and anti-enforcement injunctions violate the fundamental EU right of access to justice and constitute a tort under German law

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 47 EU Charter; Art. 2(1), 19(4) GG; § 823(1) BGB

    Note: The court found that Netgear's US AEI application before the C.D. Cal. violated Huawei's EU Charter right to access to justice and constituted an unlawful act under German tort law.

  • Provisional measures including requirement to withdraw the US AEI application within 24 hours are appropriate

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 62 UPCA

    Note: The court ordered Netgear to withdraw its C.D. Cal. AEI application within 24 hours of service, or face fines up to EUR 250,000 per day.

Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.

No rejected arguments captured.