Judge intelligence
Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.
Thomas
Dusseldorf LD
Total cases
80
PI grant rate
60%
Infringement rate
100%
Median time-to-decision (days)
159
Roles
presiding, rapporteur
Outcome breakdown
- Procedural only61
- PI granted5
- Settled4
- Costs only3
- Withdrawn2
- Dismissed2
- Infringed1
- Permanent injunction1
- PI denied1
Roles
- Presiding Judge
- Presiding Judge (acting for Judge-Rapporteur Dr. Thom, Düsseldorf Local Division)
- Presiding Judge (acting for judge-rapporteur Dr. Thom)
- Presiding Judge / Judge-Rapporteur
- Presiding Judge / Judge-Rapporteur (Düsseldorf Local Division)
- Presiding Judge / Judge-rapporteur
- Presiding Judge / judge-rapporteur
- Presiding Judge acting as Rapporteur
- Presiding Judge and Judge-rapporteur
- Presiding Judge and judge-rapporteur
- Presiding judge
- Presiding judge (acting for judge-rapporteur Dr. Thom)
- Presiding judge acting for judge-rapporteur Dr. Thom
- Presiding judge and Judge-rapporteur
- Presiding judge and judge-rapporteur
- Presiding judge and judge-rapporteur (Vorsitzender Richter)
- Presiding judge, judge-rapporteur
- Vorsitzender Richter
- Vorsitzender Richter (judge-rapporteur)
- Vorsitzender Richter / Berichterstatter
- Vorsitzender Richter and judge-rapporteur
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
- —UPC_APP_18809/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyRädlinger Maschinenbau GmbH v Henle Baumaschinentechnik GmbH
- —UPC_APP_60286/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyValeo Electrification v Magna PT B.V. & Co. KG
- —ORD_29159/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyQUANTIFICARE S.A. v Canfield Scientific, Inc.
- —UPC_APP_18828/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural only10x Genomics, Inc. v Curio Bioscience Inc.
- —UPC_APP_59991/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyValeo Electrification v Magna PT B.V. & Co. KG
- —ACT_60376/2024Dusseldorf LDCosts onlySeoul Viosys Co., Ltd. v expert e-Commerce GmbH
- —ORD_18772/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyAtlas Global Technologies GmbH v TP-LINK CORPORATION PTE.LTD.
- —UPC_APP_9978/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural only10x Genomics, Inc. v Curio Bioscience Inc.
- —UPC_APP_1714/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyDolby International AB v HP Deutschland GmbH
- —UPC_APP_2249/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlySeoul Viosys Co., Ltd. v expert e-Commerce GmbH
- —UPC_APP_6926/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyFUJIFILM Corporation v Kodak GmbH
- —UPC_APP_8500/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyCurio Bioscience Inc. v 10x Genomics, Inc.
- —UPC_APP_9671/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural only10x Genomics, Inc. v Curio Bioscience Inc.
- —UPC_APP_14943/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural only10x Genomics, Inc. v Curio Bioscience Inc.
- —ACT_14438/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyOTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE S.L.
- —UPC_APP_6761/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyFUJIFILM Corporation v Kodak GmbH
- —ORD_20781/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyAesculap AG v Shanghai International Holding Corporation GmbH (Europe)
- —UPC_APP_26391/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyAesculap AG v Shanghai International Holding Corporation GmbH (Europe)
- —ACT_35974/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyEcovacs Robotics Co., Ltd. v Roborock (HK) Limited
- —UPC_APP_35230/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyOna Patents SL v Google Ireland Limited
- —UPC_CFI_1325/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyVan Loon Beheer Nederland B.V. v Inverquark Deutschland GmbH
- —UPC_CFI_1589/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyKomax Holding AG v Jiangsu BOZHIWANG Automation Equipment Co., Ltd.
- —UPC_CFI_834/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyEcovacs Robotics Co., Ltd. v Roborock (HK) Limited
- —UPC_CFI_723/2025Dusseldorf LDPI grantedAlign Technology, Inc. v Angelalign Technology Inc.
- —UPC_APP_47922/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlySodaStream Industries Ltd. v Aarke AB