Judge intelligence
Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.
Thom
Dusseldorf LD
Total cases
34
PI grant rate
67%
Infringement rate
67%
Median time-to-decision (days)
159
Roles
legally_qualified, presiding, rapporteur
Outcome breakdown
- Procedural only21
- PI granted5
- Settled3
- Infringed2
- Withdrawn1
- Not infringed1
- PI denied1
Roles
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Judge-Rapporteur (legally qualified)
- Judge-Rapporteur / Legally Qualified Judge
- Judge-rapporteur
- Judge-rapporteur (Richterin)
- Legally Qualified Judge
- Legally Qualified Judge (acting for Presiding Judge Thomas)
- Legally Qualified Judge / Judge-Rapporteur
- Legally Qualified Judge and Rapporteur
- Legally qualified judge
- Legally qualified judge (representing presiding judge Thomas)
- Rechtlich qualifizierte Richterin
- Rechtlich qualifizierte Richterin / Berichterstatterin
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
- —UPC_APP_59991/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyValeo Electrification v Magna PT B.V. & Co. KG
- —ORD_18772/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyAtlas Global Technologies GmbH v TP-LINK CORPORATION PTE.LTD.
- —UPC_CFI_723/2025Dusseldorf LDPI grantedAlign Technology, Inc. v Angelalign Technology Inc.
- —UPC_APP_47922/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlySodaStream Industries Ltd. v Aarke AB
- —UPC_APP_41418/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyOna Patents SL v Google Ireland Limited
- —ORD_18121/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyOrtovox Sportartikel GmbH v Mammut Sports Group AG
- —UPC_APP_55249/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlySodaStream Industries Ltd. v Aarke AB
- —ACT_459767/2023Dusseldorf LDInfringedFranz Kaldewei GmbH & Co. KG v Bette GmbH & Co. KG
- —UPC_APP_44884/2024Dusseldorf LDSettledSeoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. v Amazon Services Europe S.à r.l.
- —ORD_23580/2024Dusseldorf LDPI granted10x Genomics, Inc. v Curio Bioscience Inc.
- —ACT_590953/2023Dusseldorf LDPI granted10x Genomics, Inc. v Curio Bioscience Inc.
- —ORD_29532/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyAtlas Global Technologies GmbH v TP-LINK CORPORATION PTE. LTD.
- —UPC_APP_17300/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyAtlas Global Technologies GmbH v Vantiva SA
- —ORD_59318/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyDexcom Inc. v Abbott Logistics B.V.
- —UPC_APP_33295/2025Dusseldorf LDWithdrawnDDP Specialty Electronic Materials US, LLC. v Greenchemicals S.R.L.
- —UPC_APP_32860/2025Dusseldorf LDSettledTruma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KG v CAN Srl Airxcel Europe
- —ACT_590302/2023Dusseldorf LDNot infringedTridonic GmbH & Co KG v CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd
- —ORD_32794/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyTRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE v IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG
- —UPC_APP_39459/2024Dusseldorf LDSettledAbbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Sibio Technology Limited
- —UPC_APP_33733/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyHologic, Inc. v Siemens Healthineers AG
- —ORD_35905/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlySodaStream Industries Ltd. v Aarke AB
- —UPC_APP_23193/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyDolby International AB v HP Deutschland GmbH
- —ACT_18551/2024Dusseldorf LDPI deniedNovartis AG v Celltrion Inc.
- —UPC_APP_9340/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyF. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
- —ACT_6665/2024Dusseldorf LDInfringedErwin Härtwich v Knaus Tabbert AG