Judge intelligence
Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.
Legal principlecosts gap in absence of main proceedings addressed by analogy to R. 118.5 RoP or R. 213.2 RoPClear all
Thom
Dusseldorf LD
Total cases
34
PI grant rate
67%
Infringement rate
67%
Median time-to-decision (days)
159
Roles
legally_qualified, presiding, rapporteur
Outcome breakdown
- Procedural only21
- PI granted5
- Settled3
- Infringed2
- Withdrawn1
- Not infringed1
- PI denied1
Roles
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Judge-Rapporteur (legally qualified)
- Judge-Rapporteur / Legally Qualified Judge
- Judge-rapporteur
- Judge-rapporteur (Richterin)
- Legally Qualified Judge
- Legally Qualified Judge (acting for Presiding Judge Thomas)
- Legally Qualified Judge / Judge-Rapporteur
- Legally Qualified Judge and Rapporteur
- Legally qualified judge
- Legally qualified judge (representing presiding judge Thomas)
- Rechtlich qualifizierte Richterin
- Rechtlich qualifizierte Richterin / Berichterstatterin
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
- —UPC_APP_59991/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyValeo Electrification v Magna PT B.V. & Co. KG
- —ORD_18772/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyAtlas Global Technologies GmbH v TP-LINK CORPORATION PTE.LTD.
- —UPC_CFI_723/2025Dusseldorf LDPI grantedAlign Technology, Inc. v Angelalign Technology Inc.
- —UPC_APP_47922/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlySodaStream Industries Ltd. v Aarke AB
- —UPC_APP_41418/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyOna Patents SL v Google Ireland Limited
- —ORD_18121/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyOrtovox Sportartikel GmbH v Mammut Sports Group AG
- —UPC_APP_55249/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlySodaStream Industries Ltd. v Aarke AB
- —ACT_459767/2023Dusseldorf LDInfringedFranz Kaldewei GmbH & Co. KG v Bette GmbH & Co. KG
- —UPC_APP_44884/2024Dusseldorf LDSettledSeoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. v Amazon Services Europe S.à r.l.
- —ORD_23580/2024Dusseldorf LDPI granted10x Genomics, Inc. v Curio Bioscience Inc.
- —ACT_590953/2023Dusseldorf LDPI granted10x Genomics, Inc. v Curio Bioscience Inc.
- —ORD_29532/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyAtlas Global Technologies GmbH v TP-LINK CORPORATION PTE. LTD.
- —UPC_APP_17300/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyAtlas Global Technologies GmbH v Vantiva SA
- —ORD_59318/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyDexcom Inc. v Abbott Logistics B.V.
- —UPC_APP_33295/2025Dusseldorf LDWithdrawnDDP Specialty Electronic Materials US, LLC. v Greenchemicals S.R.L.
- —UPC_APP_32860/2025Dusseldorf LDSettledTruma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KG v CAN Srl Airxcel Europe
- —ACT_590302/2023Dusseldorf LDNot infringedTridonic GmbH & Co KG v CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd
- —ORD_32794/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyTRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE v IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG
- —UPC_APP_39459/2024Dusseldorf LDSettledAbbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Sibio Technology Limited
- —UPC_APP_33733/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyHologic, Inc. v Siemens Healthineers AG
- —ORD_35905/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlySodaStream Industries Ltd. v Aarke AB
- —UPC_APP_23193/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyDolby International AB v HP Deutschland GmbH
- —ACT_18551/2024Dusseldorf LDPI deniedNovartis AG v Celltrion Inc.
- —UPC_APP_9340/2024Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyF. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
- —ACT_6665/2024Dusseldorf LDInfringedErwin Härtwich v Knaus Tabbert AG