UPC CFI 156/2024

Vor dem UPC: SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme GmbH (11 Verfahren)·Yunex GmbH (5 Verfahren)

• 2025-02-19
  Öffentlich

  Zusammenfassung: The Munich Local Division granted Chainzone Technology's application for access to the court file under Rule 262.1(b) RoP in evidence-preservation proceedings. Access was granted following SWARCO's lack of objection, noting that Chainzone had been admitted as an intervener in parallel proceedings before the Vienna Local Division.

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (2)

  • Third party access to court file under Rule 262.1(b) RoP
  • Intervention and access rights in related proceedings
• 2025-02-19
  Application for preserving evidence pursuant to RoP192Öffentlich

  Zusammenfassung: Order of the Munich Local Division (full panel) in evidence-preservation proceedings brought by SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme against Yunex GmbH concerning EP 2 643 717 (traffic signal systems). Following resolution of the evidence-preservation application, the court addressed procedural questions: (1) Rule 360 RoP applies by analogy to evidence-preservation proceedings; (2) Rule 198.1 RoP applies by analogy in cases of resolution of an evidence-preservation application; (3) costs are reserved for the main proceedings. The order also addressed standards for specific and substantiated denial of facts (Regel 171.2 and 284 RoP).

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (5)

  • Evidence-preservation proceedings under Rule 192 RoP
  • Analogous application of Rule 360 to evidence-preservation proceedings
  • Analogous application of Rule 198.1 on resolution of evidence-preservation application
  • Costs reservation for main proceedings
  • Substantiated denial requirement under Rules 171.2 and 284 RoP