UPC CFI 164/2024

Vor dem UPC: Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy (29 Verfahren)·Microsoft Group (34 Verfahren)

• 2025-03-03
  Öffentlich

  Zusammenfassung: The Central Division Paris ordered claimant Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy to appoint a new patent-qualified representative to replace its existing representative who lacked the requisite independence required under UPC rules. The court granted a period for compliance and required ratification of prior acts. The defendant's request to reject the infringement action as manifestly inadmissible was deferred pending the claimant's compliance.

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)

  • Validity of representation by corporate representative lacking independence
  • Requirement for qualified patent representative under Art. 48 UPCA
  • Ratification of acts by invalid representative
  • Inadmissibility under Rule 361 RoP