UPC CoA 570/2024

Vor dem UPC: Microsoft Group (34 Verfahren)·Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy (29 Verfahren)

• 2024-10-15
  Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)Öffentlich

  Zusammenfassung: Court of Appeal dismissed Microsoft's request for discretionary review (Rule 220.3 RoP) of the Paris Central Division's order refusing to declare Suinno's infringement action manifestly inadmissible under Rule 361 RoP on account of alleged lack of independence of Suinno's representative. The CoA held that the manifestly inadmissible threshold under Rule 361 RoP requires clear-cut cases without in-depth analysis, and that the CFI's refusal to find manifest inadmissibility was not an appropriate case for discretionary review.

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)

  • Discretionary review under Rule 220.3 RoP
  • Manifest inadmissibility under Rule 361 RoP
  • Independence of UPC representative under Art. 48(5) UPCA
  • Managing director/shareholder as representative