UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC APP 42138/2024

·EP2671173: METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Verfahrensführungsanordnungen
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: (not specified)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Tilman Müller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Division
Paris CD
Richter
Technology
Computing & AI
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
17. Sept. 2024
Entscheidungen
  • 2024-09-17
    AbgewiesenApplication Rop 333

    Order of the Central Division Paris Seat in Microsoft v Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies (EP 2 671 173). The panel dismissed Microsoft's application to review the judge-rapporteur's earlier order that had rejected Microsoft's request to declare Suinno's action manifestly inadmissible under R. 361 RoP. The panel held that manifest inadmissibility requires the defect to be clearly evident without in-depth analysis. Microsoft's alternative request for leave to appeal and for a preliminary ruling by the CJEU on the independence requirement under Art. 48(5) UPCA was also addressed.

    Rechtsfragen:Manifest inadmissibility under R. 361 RoPIndependence of representatives under Art. 48(5) UPCAPreliminary ruling reference to CJEU
Dokumente
  • C5B389F6811A0F805E5C1F870CEEA723_en.pdf2024-09-17EN