UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 67889/2024

Dec 23, 2024·EP2671173 +1 more: METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Generic
Category
Document Access (RoP262)
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Tilman Pfrang (Meissner Bolte Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaft mbB)
Respondents
Reps: Tilman Müller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Division
Paris CD
Technology
Computing & AI
Language
English
First decided
Jan 24, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-01-24
    Application RoP262.1 (b)

    The Paris Central Division (sitting as CFI) dismissed the Institute of Professional Representatives before the EPO (EPI)'s application for public access to written pleadings and evidence in the Suinno v Microsoft infringement proceedings (UPC_CFI_164/2024, EP 2 671 173). The Court held that the interest in protecting the integrity and independence of proceedings (particularly given the EPI's professional interest in the status of in-house European Patent Attorneys at the UPC) outweighed the access interest, as the matter raised a purely legal and general issue that did not require access to the specific case file.

    Legal issues:Public access to register under R. 262.1(b) RoPArt. 45 UPCA — open proceedings vs. confidentialityIn-house European Patent Attorney representation rights
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
action.phaseChange.caseClose2025-11-05Not public
Final order 67889-2024 anonymized2025-01-24Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-01-24Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-01-24Not public
access to register2025-01-24Not public
access to register2025-01-24Public
Submission2025-01-13Not public
Comments to file inspection request2025-01-09Not public
preliminary order2024-12-24Not public
file inspection request2024-12-23Not public