View all cases
UPC APP 67889/2024
Dec 23, 2024·EP2671173 +1 more: METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionGenericCategoryDocument Access (RoP262)
- Parties
- ClaimantsReps: Tilman Pfrang (Meissner Bolte Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaft mbB)RespondentsReps: Tilman Müller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg)
- Division
- Paris CD
- Technology
- Computing & AI
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Jan 24, 2025
Decisions
- 2025-01-24Application RoP262.1 (b)
The Paris Central Division (sitting as CFI) dismissed the Institute of Professional Representatives before the EPO (EPI)'s application for public access to written pleadings and evidence in the Suinno v Microsoft infringement proceedings (UPC_CFI_164/2024, EP 2 671 173). The Court held that the interest in protecting the integrity and independence of proceedings (particularly given the EPI's professional interest in the status of in-house European Patent Attorneys at the UPC) outweighed the access interest, as the matter raised a purely legal and general issue that did not require access to the specific case file.
Legal issues:Public access to register under R. 262.1(b) RoPArt. 45 UPCA — open proceedings vs. confidentialityIn-house European Patent Attorney representation rights
Documents
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| action.phaseChange.caseClose | 2025-11-05 | Not public |
| Final order 67889-2024 anonymized | 2025-01-24 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-01-24 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-01-24 | Not public |
| access to register | 2025-01-24 | Not public |
| access to register | 2025-01-24 | Public |
| Submission | 2025-01-13 | Not public |
| Comments to file inspection request | 2025-01-09 | Not public |
| preliminary order | 2024-12-24 | Not public |
| file inspection request | 2024-12-23 | Not public |