UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC APP 67889/2024

23. Dez. 2024·EP2671173 +1 more: METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed
Verfahrensart
Allgemein
Kategorie
Akteneinsicht (RoP262)
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Tilman Pfrang (Meissner Bolte Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte Partnerschaft mbB)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Tilman Müller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Division
Paris CD
Technology
Computing & AI
Sprache
English
Erste Entscheidung
24. Jan. 2025
Entscheidungen
  • 2025-01-24
    Application RoP262.1 (b)

    The Paris Central Division (sitting as CFI) dismissed the Institute of Professional Representatives before the EPO (EPI)'s application for public access to written pleadings and evidence in the Suinno v Microsoft infringement proceedings (UPC_CFI_164/2024, EP 2 671 173). The Court held that the interest in protecting the integrity and independence of proceedings (particularly given the EPI's professional interest in the status of in-house European Patent Attorneys at the UPC) outweighed the access interest, as the matter raised a purely legal and general issue that did not require access to the specific case file.

    Rechtsfragen:Public access to register under R. 262.1(b) RoPArt. 45 UPCA — open proceedings vs. confidentialityIn-house European Patent Attorney representation rights
Dokumente
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
action.phaseChange.caseClose2025-11-05Nicht öffentlich
Final order 67889-2024 anonymized2025-01-24Nicht öffentlich
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-01-24Nicht öffentlich
Outcome of the Order2025-01-24Nicht öffentlich
access to register2025-01-24Nicht öffentlich
access to register2025-01-24Öffentlich
Submission2025-01-13Nicht öffentlich
Comments to file inspection request2025-01-09Nicht öffentlich
preliminary order2024-12-24Nicht öffentlich
file inspection request2024-12-23Nicht öffentlich