UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges3Parties4Firms

Judge intelligence

Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.

Legal principlecosts apportionment where both parties partially succeedClear all

Graham Ashley

Court of Appeal · Dusseldorf LD · Milan LD · Munich LD

Clear and return to cohort view
Total cases
24
PI grant rate
—
Infringement rate
100%
Median time-to-decision (days)
438
Roles
technically_qualified
Outcome breakdown
  • Procedural only11
  • Pending7
  • PI denied2
  • Partially revoked2
  • Infringed1
  • Dismissed1
Roles
  • Technically Qualified Judge
  • Technically qualified judge
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
  • —UPC_APP_2369/2025Procedural onlyHeraeus Electronics GmbH & Co. KG v Vibrantz GmbH
  • —UPC_APP_55674/2024Procedural onlyDyson Technology Limited v SharkNinja Europe Limited
  • —UPC_APP_5885/2025Procedural onlyDainese S.p.A. v Alpinestars S.p.A.
  • —UPC_APP_63772/2024Procedural onlyDainese S.p.A. v Alpinestars S.p.A.
  • —UPC_APP_8545/2025Procedural onlyDainese S.p.A. v Alpinestars S.p.A.
  • —ACT_13227/2024Procedural onlyHeraeus Electronics GmbH & Co. KG v Vibrantz GmbH
  • —UPC_APP_52471/2024Procedural onlySharkNinja Europe Limited v Dyson Technology Limited
  • —UPC_APP_63878/2024Procedural onlyDainese S.p.A. v Alpinestars S.p.A.
  • —ACT_6665/2024InfringedErwin Härtwich v Knaus Tabbert AG
  • —UPC_APP_43938/2024Procedural onlyHeraeus Electronics GmbH & Co. KG v Vibrantz GmbH
  • —UPC_APP_283/2025DismissedSharkNinja Europe Limited v Dyson Technology Limited
  • —UPC_APP_1176/2025Procedural onlyDainese S.p.A. v Alpinestars S.p.A.
  • —APL_32012/2024PI deniedDyson Technology Limited v SharkNinja Europe Limited
  • —UPC_APP_67917/2024Procedural onlyDainese S.p.A. v Alpinestars S.p.A.
  • 2025-04-23UPC_CFI_368/2025—Yellow Sphere Innovations GmbH v Knaus Tabbert AG
  • 2025-02-27UPC_CFI_182/2025—Alpinestars S.p.A. v Dainese S.p.A.
  • 2024-12-20UPC_CFI_831/2024—Motocard Bike S.l. v Dainese S.p.A.
  • 2024-12-11UPC_CFI_792/2024—Alpinestars Research S.p.A. v Dainese S.p.A.
  • 2024-08-07UPC_CFI_472/2024—Dainese S.p.A. v Alpinestars S.p.A.
  • 2024-07-29UPC_CFI_448/2024Partially revokedVibrantz GmbH v Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co. KG
  • 2024-05-30UPC_CoA_297/2024PI deniedDyson Technology Limited v SharkNinja Europe Limited
  • 2024-05-23CC_30134/2024—Knaus Tabbert AG v Name not displayed for GDPR reasons. Represented by Dirk JESTAEDT
  • 2024-03-12UPC_CFI_114/2024Partially revokedHeraeus Electronics GmbH & Co. KG v Vibrantz GmbH
  • 2024-02-07UPC_CFI_50/2024—Name not displayed for GDPR reasons. Represented by Dirk JESTAEDT v Knaus Tabbert AG