Judge intelligence
Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.
Schumacher
Dusseldorf LD
Total cases
21
PI grant rate
100%
Infringement rate
100%
Median time-to-decision (days)
—
Roles
legally_qualified, rapporteur
Outcome breakdown
- Procedural only15
- Settled3
- Withdrawn1
- Permanent injunction1
- PI granted1
Roles
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Judge-Rapporteur (legally qualified)
- Judge-Rapporteur / Legally Qualified Judge
- Judge-rapporteur
- Legally Qualified Judge
- Legally Qualified Judge / Judge-Rapporteur
- Legally Qualified Judge and Judge-Rapporteur
- Legally Qualified Judge and Rapporteur
- Legally qualified judge
- Legally qualified judge (judge-rapporteur)
- Legally qualified judge / judge-rapporteur
- Legally qualified judge and judge-rapporteur (Berichterstatterin)
- Legally qualified judge, judge-rapporteur
- Rechtlich qualifizierte Richterin / Berichterstatterin
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
- —ORD_29159/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyQUANTIFICARE S.A. v Canfield Scientific, Inc.
- —ACT_14438/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyOTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE S.L.
- —ACT_35974/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyEcovacs Robotics Co., Ltd. v Roborock (HK) Limited
- —UPC_APP_28536/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyWonderland Nurserygoods Co., Ltd. v Cybex GmbH
- —UPC_CFI_1325/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyVan Loon Beheer Nederland B.V. v Inverquark Deutschland GmbH
- —UPC_CFI_1589/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyKomax Holding AG v Jiangsu BOZHIWANG Automation Equipment Co., Ltd.
- —UPC_CFI_834/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyEcovacs Robotics Co., Ltd. v Roborock (HK) Limited
- —UPC_APP_16306/2025Dusseldorf LDWithdrawnGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA v Pfizer Europe MA EEIG
- —UPC_APP_32878/2025Dusseldorf LDPermanent injunctionigus GmbH v Whale Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
- —UPC_APP_35497/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyTRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE v IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG
- —UPC_APP_33456/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyQIAGEN Sciences, LLC v bioMérieux SA
- —UPC_APP_32860/2025Dusseldorf LDSettledTruma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KG v CAN Srl Airxcel Europe
- —UPC_APP_27426/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyQIAGEN Sciences, LLC v bioMérieux SA
- —ORD_32794/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyTRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE v IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG
- —UPC_APP_11294/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyF. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
- —UPC_APP_35609/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyDai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd. v Zapp AG
- —ORD_33920/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyWonderland Nurserygoods Co., Ltd. v Cybex GmbH
- —UPC_APP_36247/2025Dusseldorf LDSettledEyesmatch Ltd v Microsoft Corp.
- —UPC_APP_12931/2025Dusseldorf LDSettledHand Held Products, Inc. v Scandit AG
- —UPC_APP_35917/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyTRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE v IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG
- —UPC_CFI_692/2026Dusseldorf LDPI grantedbeMatrix NV v Yaham Recience Technology Co., Ltd.