UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges2Parties3Firms

Judge intelligence

Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.

Legal principleEx parte provisional measures available at trade fair exhibitions for urgent patent infringementClear all

Schumacher

Dusseldorf LD

Clear and return to cohort view
Total cases
21
PI grant rate
100%
Infringement rate
100%
Median time-to-decision (days)
—
Roles
legally_qualified, rapporteur
Outcome breakdown
  • Procedural only15
  • Settled3
  • Withdrawn1
  • Permanent injunction1
  • PI granted1
Roles
  • Judge-Rapporteur
  • Judge-Rapporteur (legally qualified)
  • Judge-Rapporteur / Legally Qualified Judge
  • Judge-rapporteur
  • Legally Qualified Judge
  • Legally Qualified Judge / Judge-Rapporteur
  • Legally Qualified Judge and Judge-Rapporteur
  • Legally Qualified Judge and Rapporteur
  • Legally qualified judge
  • Legally qualified judge (judge-rapporteur)
  • Legally qualified judge / judge-rapporteur
  • Legally qualified judge and judge-rapporteur (Berichterstatterin)
  • Legally qualified judge, judge-rapporteur
  • Rechtlich qualifizierte Richterin / Berichterstatterin
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
  • —ORD_29159/2025Procedural onlyQUANTIFICARE S.A. v Canfield Scientific, Inc.
  • —ACT_14438/2025Procedural onlyOTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE S.L.
  • —ACT_35974/2025Procedural onlyEcovacs Robotics Co., Ltd. v Roborock (HK) Limited
  • —UPC_APP_28536/2025Procedural onlyWonderland Nurserygoods Co., Ltd. v Cybex GmbH
  • —UPC_CFI_1325/2025Procedural onlyVan Loon Beheer Nederland B.V. v Inverquark Deutschland GmbH
  • —UPC_CFI_1589/2025Procedural onlyKomax Holding AG v Jiangsu BOZHIWANG Automation Equipment Co., Ltd.
  • —UPC_CFI_834/2025Procedural onlyEcovacs Robotics Co., Ltd. v Roborock (HK) Limited
  • —UPC_APP_16306/2025WithdrawnGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA v Pfizer Europe MA EEIG
  • —UPC_APP_32878/2025Permanent injunctionigus GmbH v Whale Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
  • —UPC_APP_35497/2025Procedural onlyTRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE v IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG
  • —UPC_APP_33456/2025Procedural onlyQIAGEN Sciences, LLC v bioMérieux SA
  • —UPC_APP_32860/2025SettledTruma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KG v CAN Srl Airxcel Europe
  • —UPC_APP_27426/2025Procedural onlyQIAGEN Sciences, LLC v bioMérieux SA
  • —ORD_32794/2025Procedural onlyTRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE v IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG
  • —UPC_APP_11294/2025Procedural onlyF. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
  • —UPC_APP_35609/2025Procedural onlyDai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd. v Zapp AG
  • —ORD_33920/2025Procedural onlyWonderland Nurserygoods Co., Ltd. v Cybex GmbH
  • —UPC_APP_36247/2025SettledEyesmatch Ltd v Microsoft Corp.
  • —UPC_APP_12931/2025SettledHand Held Products, Inc. v Scandit AG
  • —UPC_APP_35917/2025Procedural onlyTRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE v IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG
  • —UPC_CFI_692/2026PI grantedbeMatrix NV v Yaham Recience Technology Co., Ltd.